ClubCompare logo
TaylorMade SIM2 Max Irons Review: Are They Still Worth It in 2025?
By ClubCompare Writers • November 25, 2025

The TaylorMade SIM2 Max irons remain one of the most popular game-improvement iron sets even years after their release. Designed to blend distance, forgiveness and a smoother feel, the SIM2 Max irons are still a go-to choice for golfers seeking higher launch and easier ball-striking. In this review we’ll examine the tech, performance, who they suit, fitting tips, and whether buying SIM2 Max in 2025 is a smart move.

💡 Quick Tip: SIM2 Max irons are strong on forgiveness and distance, but if you prioritize shot-shaping or forged feel, a players iron may suit you better.

1. Overview

Built around TaylorMade’s multi-material engineering, the SIM2 Max irons focus on making golf easier for the average player. They were engineered to maximize ball speed, raise launch, and preserve distance on off-center hits. The set combines a low CG, a speed pocket for low-face strikes, and internal damping to deliver a polished feel that belies the game-improvement profile.

2. Key Technology & Design Features

3. Performance & Feel

Distance & Forgiveness: SIM2 Max irons consistently show strong ball speeds and retained carry on mishits thanks to the Speed Pocket and Cap Back construction. Many golfers report gaining roughly a club of distance versus older cavity-backs while enjoying a much larger effective sweet spot.

Trajectory & Spin: Expect a mid-to-high launch and mid spin rates. The low CG encourages a climbing trajectory, which is helpful for players who struggle to get the ball airborne with longer irons.

Sound & Impact Feedback: The ECHO system tempers unpleasant vibration, producing a clean, solid "crack" on center strikes and forgiving feedback on thin hits. While not as buttery as forged blades, the SIM2 Max feel is notably refined for a game-improvement iron.

4. Pros & Cons (Quick Summary)

Pros

  • Very forgiving across the face
  • Excellent distance for a GI iron
  • High launch and usable carry even on thin strikes
  • Improved feel with ECHO damping
  • Durable construction & good resale value

Cons

  • Limited workability for serious shot-shapers
  • Larger profile may not appeal to traditionalists
  • Stronger lofts may require gapping adjustments
  • Not a substitute for a forged player's iron on feel

5. Who Should Play SIM2 Max?

Ideal candidates:

Less ideal: Low handicap players and those who prioritize extreme workability or a forged feel. If you shape shots regularly or prefer compact head shapes, consider a players-distance or players iron instead.

6. Fitting Tips & Gapping Strategy

7. Value, Durability & Longevity

SIM2 Max irons hold up well over time. The multi-material construction and high-strength face are durable, and the set often provides outstanding value on the secondary market in 2025. For many golfers, buying a lightly used SIM2 Max set yields modern tech at a steep discount versus brand-new models.

8. How SIM2 Max Compares to Newer Models

While newer models (like TaylorMade’s later lines and competitors’ recent GI offerings) have refined certain elements, SIM2 Max remains competitive thanks to its combination of launch, stability, and feel. In many head-to-head tests for mid-speed players, SIM2 Max still performs similarly to newer releases in carry and forgiveness—often at a better price point.

9. Final Thoughts

The TaylorMade SIM2 Max irons are still an excellent choice in 2025 for golfers who want forgiveness, distance, and a comfortable feel without sacrificing playability. They are especially compelling for mid- to high-handicap players and anyone who wants a forgiving long game. If you prioritize shot-shaping or extremely refined forged feel, consider a players' iron — but for the vast majority of golfers, SIM2 Max offers performance and value that remain hard to beat.

💡 Next Step: Book a short fit session and test SIM2 Max against a modern competitors' set. Use our club comparison tool to compare current prices and shaft options across Canadian retailers.

Sources